Getting Started with Spring RCP
Creating a View
Now we will create a new window in our application.
- Right-click the project node and choose New | Spring View, as shown here:
- In the New Spring View dialog, type "CustomerView" and set the existing package as your package name:
- Click Finish. You now have a new class that extends the Spring RCP AbstractView class:
package simple;
import javax.swing.JComponent;
import javax.swing.JPanel;
import org.springframework.richclient.application.support.AbstractView;
public class CustomerView extends AbstractView {
@Override
protected JComponent createControl() {
JPanel panel = new JPanel();
return panel;
}
}Open the richclient-application-context.xml file. At the end of the file, notice that your view has been automatically registered for you as follows:
<bean id="CustomerView" class="org.springframework.richclient.application.support.DefaultViewDescriptor">
<property name="viewClass" value="simple.CustomerView"></property>
</bean>Finally, open ui/messages.properties and notice the new entry for the menu item that will open the view:
CustomerView.label=&CustomerView
- Run the application and go to Window | Show View, from where you can open the new Customer View:
- Let's make our new view open by default whenever the application starts. In other words, our Customer View will be the application's initial view. To do that, open the richclient-application-context.xml file and find the bean that has "lifecycleAdvisor" as its "id" attribute. Add this property to that bean's list of properties:
<property name="startingPageId" value="CustomerView" />
Notice that the "name" attribute can be completed automatically if you call up code completion (which is Ctrl-Space, by default):
Therefore, the whole bean definition is now as follows:
<bean id="lifecycleAdvisor" class="simple.SimpleLifecycleAdvisor">
<property name="startingPageId" value="CustomerView" />
<property name="windowCommandBarDefinitions" value="ui/commands-context.xml" />
<property name="windowCommandManagerBeanName" value="windowCommandManager" />
<property name="menubarBeanName" value="menuBar" />
<property name="toolbarBeanName" value="toolBar" />
</bean> - Run the application again and notice that the Customer View now appears when the application starts.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| figure-1.png | 49.01 KB |
| figure-2.png | 37.15 KB |
| figure-3.png | 10.45 KB |
| figure-4.png | 24.74 KB |
| figure-5.png | 49.25 KB |
| figure-6.png | 9.61 KB |
| figure-7.png | 62.91 KB |
| figure-8.png | 22.96 KB |
| figure-9.png | 108.96 KB |
| figure-10.png | 64.77 KB |
| figure-11.png | 121.18 KB |
| figure-12.png | 25.68 KB |
| figure-13.png | 20.96 KB |
| figure-14.png | 105.25 KB |
| figure-15.png | 3.28 KB |
| figure-16.png | 6.23 KB |
| figure-17.png | 94.77 KB |
| figure-18.png | 80.02 KB |
| figure-19.png | 26.8 KB |
| figure-20.png | 24.82 KB |
| figure-21.png | 2.76 KB |
| figure-22.png | 9.17 KB |
| figure-23.png | 98.88 KB |
| figure-24.png | 99.05 KB |
| figure-25.png | 117.51 KB |
| figure-26.png | 99.56 KB |
| figure-27.png | 89.89 KB |
| figure-28.png | 109.22 KB |
| figure-29.png | 211.88 KB |
- Login or register to post comments
- 56747 reads
- Printer-friendly version
(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)










Comments
Jacek replied on Tue, 2008/07/01 - 6:31am
Don't get me wrong, it's a nice effort...but the amount of XML config required to make the most basic of setup makes my stomach turn. Really, most of this should be one method call to some common ancestor or static class to register and configure your views.
I don't want to even think what sort of havoc you could wreck on your app if you did any major refactoring of your code and your IDE didn't update the Spring XML files correctly.
It seems like the wrong solution for an issue than in 95% of the cases will not change over time any way and hence does probably not need to be soft-coded in XML, down to every last little detail.
But Spring is the hot kid on the block these days, so I guess that's the way everyone is going...I for once would prefer that someone creates something equivalent but lets you configure it with simple annotations like EJB 3.0. Isn't annotation support part of the new Spring release?
Could this example be re-worked to avoid configuring every single detail in XML and using the new Spring annotations instead?
Geertjan Wielenga replied on Tue, 2008/07/01 - 6:46am
Jacek replied on Tue, 2008/07/01 - 6:52am
Yes, but let's face it....since the project lead left to join Adobe, JSR-296 seems to be as dead as the dodo, if I recall correctly.
https://appframework.dev.java.net/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=1567
The last release is from Nov 2007 when Hans was still employed with Sun...doesn't exactly install confidence in the long term viability of this JSR. Say what you want about Spring, but at least it has a large active community.
Geertjan Wielenga replied on Tue, 2008/07/01 - 6:58am
in response to: Jacek
Yes, but let's face it....since the project lead left to join Adobe, JSR-296 seems to be as dead as the dodo, if I recall correctly.
https://appframework.dev.java.net/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=1567
The last release is from Nov 2007 when Hans was still employed with Sun...doesn't exactly install confidence in the long term viability of this JSR. Say what you want about Spring, but at least it has a large active community.
[/quote]
True enough, except that Spring RCP hasn't existed in any real form over the past years. Now it's back but there's no guarantee that it'll go anywhere. (The 1.0.0 release just came out, after two years, and so who knows when the next release will be with us?) I would personally like it to do so (hence this article and hence the tooling I'm providing, should you need evidence), but there's no guarantees (hard to argue with Kirill's comments here). In that sense, depending on Spring RCP is as problematic as depending on JSR-296, but for different reasons. (And that's why I focused only on the technology in this article without being distracted by the politics around it.)
Jacek replied on Tue, 2008/07/01 - 7:03am
in response to: geertjan
doclolieven replied on Tue, 2008/07/01 - 10:15am
in response to: Jacek
Don't get me wrong, it's a nice effort...but the amount of XML config required to make the most basic of setup makes my stomach turn. Really, most of this should be one method call to some common ancestor or static class to register and configure your views.
[/quote]
You're right, but the registration you speak of is just the sort of locator pattern we want to refactor out of the system. I'm looking into the annotation based configuration, which works great as long as you don't do a lot of configuration besides injecting other beans (f.e. using a propertyplaceholder configurer in conjunction with the component scanning provided in Spring 2.5 is proving to be a real PITA).
I don't think the XML configuration is that much of a burden, if you have a good IDE with Spring support I don't think you'll have a lot of issues. I've worked in a company where all products were made with Spring RCP, and I haven't encountered any problems concerning writing all those bean definitions. There could be some improvement, but I'm thinking more in the line of custom namespaces.
Anyway, you're right in many ways. Things should be simplified. But then again, writing all my forms in YAML also seems a real hassle, and I'm sure a refactor will certainly cause all sorts havoc there too... :)
Jacek replied on Tue, 2008/07/01 - 10:23am
in response to: doclolieven
Point taken :-) I guess I just like YAML a lot more than XML (and I think writing the forms in YAML is a lot less hassle than coding them by hand, but hey...I recognize it's an off the beaten path approach).
It just seems that with Spring it's an all or nothing proposition, even the most basic config stuff is externalized. Seems overkill for 90% of apps.
Peter Karich replied on Tue, 2008/07/01 - 4:24pm
Great Geertjan!
Thanks a lot!
Does NetBeans handle the refactoring in XML? If yes, how?
>> Secondly, you can try the Swing Application Framework (JSR-296) if you want annotations rather than XML.
Isn't it possible to configure Spring with Java or a scripting language? In picocontainer this is possible with nanocontainer.
Any hints?
Geertjan Wielenga replied on Tue, 2008/07/01 - 4:29pm
Peter Karich replied on Wed, 2008/07/02 - 2:22am
But wouldn't it be cool to provide those things?
Then NetBeans will be the SpringRC-IDE ;-)
Hint: To create the simple app with your plugin it is required to have the jdk1.6 as default (javax.swing.GroupLayout)
Rohan Ranade replied on Thu, 2008/07/03 - 7:29am
weggyboy replied on Fri, 2008/09/19 - 4:15am
Hello!
Excuse me, if this is the wrong place for such questions.
I was interested in using a view to display the changes made in another view, both dockable.
How would you do that, when the both views are not known and they are created by the VLDockingApplicationPageFactory?
I though I could implement the Observer Pattern, but since the views are created by the factory I can´t get any Observable object registered in the Observer View.
Any Ideas?
Thanks!
Peter Karich replied on Fri, 2008/09/19 - 11:21am
in response to: weggyboy
Why not adding a listener to the model instead to the view?
Maybe more details are necessary to help you.
weggyboy replied on Sat, 2008/09/20 - 3:03am
in response to: peathal
Thanks for your answer Peter!
What I´ve done is exactly that, just I´m having some problems with the GUI actualization, since the form inputs works on a DialogWizard. The Other docked View must first be "resized" before the changes can be shown... Tipical GUI Problem...
Best Regards!
Wagner
prabithchandranr replied on Tue, 2008/10/07 - 8:47am
watcher replied on Thu, 2009/10/01 - 5:30am
venkatambati replied on Tue, 2009/10/27 - 5:29am
surajchhetry replied on Wed, 2009/11/11 - 10:56pm
Hi,
I am working on desktop application on Java we have Eclipse RCP,Netbean RCP,Spring RCP and etc. Currenly iam using Netbean RCP but my application using Spring a lot means IOC,AOP and DAO so is it wise to switch to Spring RCP from Netbean RCP ??