Prerequisites for Continuous Deployment
How hard could it be? Well, like with most engineering endeavors,
it’s about 99% preparation and 1% implementation. Unlike Continuous
Integration, however, continuous deployment (CD) involves business as
well as technical considerations. Let’s outline them and see how close
(or far) we are to the holy grail of devops.
Continuous Deployment is founded upon Continuous Integration
CD takes your CI process to it’s ultimate conclusion. After a successful build and automated tests, the changes are automatically pushed to production. Your CD process will only be as good as your CI process.
A good CI means you’ve got your technical ducks in a row. Sufficient test coverage combined with test environments that could easily be used in production in an emergency are indicative of considerable engineering effort on both the development and sysadmin teams.
My use of “sufficient” is no accident. I’m not going to give some magic number here, because it depends on your business. I know our current code coverage of 35% is enough for us to avoid full regression tests before making releases (which we do many times a week).
Business at the Speed of Thought
Not only was this an excellent book written by Bill Gates in 1999, but continuous deployment is the process that enables it to happen. The problem is that most businesses (like a lot of people) tend to speak before they think.
“Why is ‘widget A’ already live? I didn’t clear that for release.”
“We planned that story together for this sprint and I finished it this morning.”
“Wow – but, I didn’t clear this idea with (marketing|management|shareholders)…you have to disable it ASAP!”
This has happened to me more times than I’d care to count. Unfortunately, folks are so trained in waterfall-style thinking, they usually reserve resources for their idea months in advance in the hopes that it might be implemented before the deadline.
Until your product owners are used to your CD’s quick turn-around times, use configuration flags for enabling and disabling of “risky” features (i.e. new or majorly refactored advertisement placements). I recommend some “alphaConfiguration” file to store these temporary flags. You’ll be able to keep a better overview of all the alpha features and, of course, can remove them once they’ve finally been approved for release.
These flags give you the all-important integration step in a tightly controlled fashion. Individual commits are small changes, and the sooner you get these changes live, the sooner you detect problems. This lean methodology
Continuous Deployment is the Holy Grail of DevOps
Isn’t this a bit over the top? No, not at all. CD means that developers are making production changes with every commit (albeit via build server proxy). Operations will have 100% confidence in their infrastructure including all the necessary monitoring and logging before they hand over this amount of control.
How close am I to CD? I’m really only missing the “alphaConfiguration” file to effectively hide half-baked ideas from public consumption. How about you? What are your major obstacles to deploying continuously to your live servers?
(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)