<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://java.dzone.com"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:dz="http://www.developerzone.com/modules/dz/1.0" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
 <title>Javalobby - Comments for &quot;Knowing the State of a JavaFX Script Animation&quot;</title>
 <link>http://java.dzone.com/articles/knowing-state-javafx-script-an</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Knowing the State of a JavaFX Script Animation&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I think that we&#039;ll all get a</title>
 <link>http://java.dzone.com/articles/knowing-state-javafx-script-an#comment-2852</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I think that we&#039;ll all get a good feel for JavaFX tool direction at JavaOne -- less than two weeks away!</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:05:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jlweaver</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2852 at http://java.dzone.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I find that the tools</title>
 <link>http://java.dzone.com/articles/knowing-state-javafx-script-an#comment-2851</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I find that the tools available today don&#039;t help. I&#039;ve downloaded Netbeans RC 6.1 and to be able to develop compiled JavaFX script one has to manually download a plugin and the plugin itself doesn&#039;t offer any command completion. I know that JavaFX script is not done yet but I haven&#039;t seen anything really cool that couldn&#039;t be done using Flash or Adobe Air. The cool thing there is the binding which is nice but the animation part at least on the compiled version has no real documentation available.</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 19:30:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>carcour</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2851 at http://java.dzone.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Once you get used to it, it</title>
 <link>http://java.dzone.com/articles/knowing-state-javafx-script-an#comment-2849</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Once you get used to it, it is very easy and intuitive.  My book covers the interpreted version, but I plan on writing a compiled JavaFX Script book.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jim Weaver &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:10:09 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>jlweaver</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2849 at http://java.dzone.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>First thanks for these</title>
 <link>http://java.dzone.com/articles/knowing-state-javafx-script-an#comment-2847</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;First thanks for these interesting JavaFX tutorials. Do you really think developers will write code using this syntax? I personally find it hard to get used to or will they use the tool that Sun is developing?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also does your book cover the compiled JavaFX script?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Carl&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 15:43:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>carcour</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2847 at http://java.dzone.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
