Javalobby - Comments for "JCR and Web 2.0: A Good Fit or Too Heavy for Today's Web?"

Matthew,re "faster, lighter,

mmarth — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:07:29 -0400

Matthew,

re "faster, lighter, and cheaper": I helped David with the pres at the TSS symposium. What we did was to take static HTML from the TSS website and create a fully functioning web app in 15min live on stage (where users can post new items, an admin can approve and diapprove and the items show up on the home page).

We used CRX (Day's repository) and Apache Sling for that which makes web development on JCRs much much quicker. I completely agree that a while back there were not enough tools to do that.

We plan to create a screencast of the "15min TSS app" and post it on dev.day.com. The pres slides are are http://wiki.javasymposium.com/pages/viewpageattachments.action?pageId=50...

Cheers

Michael

Travis you are right. And I

alexandrupopescu — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:34:13 -0400

Travis you are right. And I think David knows it too, but I suppose he wouldn't have been invited at TSSJS with a talk about InfoQ :-). I think you can find my slides online, as I've been presenting details about our architecture in the past.

cheers,

./alex

.w( the_mindstorm )p.

Alexandru Popescu

My understanding is that

trumant — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:17:26 -0400

My understanding is that InfoQ.com uses a JCR backend. I'd love to see some comments, blog posts, etc from the folks that built that explaining their experiences.

Javalobby - Comments for "JCR and Web 2.0: A Good Fit or Too Heavy for Today&#039;s Web?"

Matthew,re "faster, lighter,

Travis you are right. And I

My understanding is that

Javalobby - Comments for "JCR and Web 2.0: A Good Fit or Too Heavy for Today's Web?"