Peter is a DZone MVB and is not an employee of DZone and has posted 161 posts at DZone. You can read more from them at their website. View Full User Profile

Why is it not Allowed in Java to Overload Foo(Object…) with Foo(Object[])?

  • submit to reddit

 This is from Why is it not allowed in Java to overload Foo(Object…) with Foo(Object[])?


I was wondering why it is not allowed in Java to overload Foo(Object[] args) with Foo(Object... args), though they are used in a different way?

Foo(Object[] args){}

is used like:
while the other form:
Foo(Object... args){}
is used like:
Is there any reason behind this?


This Choosing the Most Specific Method talk about this, but its quite complex. e.g. Choosing between Foo(Number... ints) and Foo(Integer... ints)
In the interests of backward compatibility, these are effectively the same thing.

publicFoo(Object... args){}// syntactic sugar for Foo(Object[] args){}// calls the varargs method.Foo(newObject[]{newObject(),newObject()});

e.g. you can define main() as
publicstaticvoid main(String... args){  
A way to make them different is to take one argument before the varargs

publicFoo(Object o,Object... os){}publicFoo(Object[] os){}Foo(newObject(),newObject());// calls the first.Foo(newObject[]{newObject(),newObject()});// calls the second.
They are not exactly the same. The subtle difference is that while you can pass an array to a varargs, you can't treat an array parameter as a varargs.

publicFoo(Object... os){}publicBar(Object[] os){}Foo(newObject[]{newObject(),newObject()});// compiles fine.Bar(newObject(),newObject());// Fails to compile.

Additionally, a varags must be the last parameter.

publicFoo(Object... os,int i){}// fails to compile.publicBar(Object[] os,int i){}// compiles ok.
Published at DZone with permission of Peter Lawrey, author and DZone MVB. (source)

(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)