NoSQL Zone is brought to you in partnership with:

Reimagining the way work is done through big data, analytics, and event processing, Chris is the cofounder of Successful Workplace. He believes there’s no end to what we can change and improve. Chris is a marketing executive and flew for the US Navy before finding a home in technology 17 years ago. An avid outdoorsman, Chris is also passionate about technology and innovation and speaks frequently about creating great business outcomes at industry events. As well as being a contributor for The TIBCO Blog, Chris contributes to the Harvard Business Review, Venture Beat, Forbes, and the PEX Network. Christopher is a DZone MVB and is not an employee of DZone and has posted 304 posts at DZone. You can read more from them at their website. View Full User Profile

What Happened to the Buzz Around NoSQL?

  • submit to reddit

NoSQL BuzzOver the past several years there has been an enormous amount of press over NoSQL, which is a way to store and retrieve data found in a less structured and less consistent form than relational databases. NoSQL was claimed to be the heir apparent to the relational database, the kind that made Oracle an enormous company and that has been the world’s standard for decades. Keep in mind that the success of the relational database allowed Larry Ellison to buy the Hawaiian Island of Lanai. Disrupting something that big would be noticeable, but to the contrary, the stories about NoSQL have become fewer and farther between.

NoSQL was held up to the be the way to horizontally scale Big Data and Web applications and to bring a new level of simplicity to data storage and retrieval. So what happened to the buzz around NoSQL?

The NoSQL Challenges

Here are some of the challenges that make NoSQL’s adoption slower than expected:

  • Transactional applications are still well-suited to relational databases with all of its built-in functionality that keep transactions intact, even if the power goes off.
  • NoSQL databases are silos of their own and a challenge to move data between. Until better standards arrive, and that may be the JSON, document-based NoSQL, there’s risk of data portability with NoSQL.
  • If your data isn’t enormous, moving off a relational database isn’t a necessity. People tend to postpone big changes that aren’t a necessity.

But on the Other Hand…

Then again, there are reasons to consider NoSQL despite the cons of NoSQL:

  • The price structure of the relational database king, Oracle. Their customers are unhappy and stuck.
  • Data will continue to grow and become a bigger problem to solve, opening more doors for NoSQL.
  • Unstructured data is being vacuumed up at a remarkable rate. If you’re not sure what data you’ll need, better to put it into a NoSQL store than to ignore it.
  • Managing complex data structures is easier from a design and coding standpoint with NoSQL.

So why the lower buzz around NoSQL? When I asked my friend Piyush Govil, CEO of Fabless Labs, he said, “SQL has such a well-understood way of storing and querying data that it becomes hard to replace until something better comes along and is equally understood. Also, Pig and Hive are like SQL and can be used to store and retrieve data from a Hadoop query, keeping us from having to use NoSQL when we’re working with Hadoop.”

There you have it. It isn’t that NoSQL isn’t an important advance in information technology … it just isn’t the revolution that the past buzz would have indicated.


Published at DZone with permission of Christopher Taylor, author and DZone MVB. (source)

(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)


Manjuka Soysa replied on Tue, 2013/11/12 - 1:51am

If there was a reduction in the buzz, it would be due to wider adoption, so it is not the latest shiny new toy everyone is talking about. MongoDB getting funding that valued it at $1 Billion got quite a bit of buzz. People have figured out where document and graph databases are suitable and where it isn't.. their usage is still probably growing at a much faster rate than relational DBs (starting from a much lower base of course). Revolution or not I don't think anyone expected relational databases to disappear altogether.

Lester Burnham replied on Tue, 2013/11/12 - 12:28pm

 We may be in the trough of disillusionment  because NoSQL doesn't cure world hunger :-)

Gonçalo Borrega replied on Wed, 2013/11/13 - 6:31am

... and relational databases are moving in the direction of supporting more in-memory data, larger datasets, columns storing to optimize analytic like queries over big datasets. That's gonna make it even harder to move away (at least in business applications) to a less structured, harder to develop against nosql model.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.