He is a entrepreneur and a software architect from Tel Aviv, Israel. He is also a technology freak with about 20 years experience working with computers. He is currently working on his first private initiative in the area of software development tools. His vision is to maximize the abilities of software developers by providing pragmatic tools that enable them to get fast results. Zviki has posted 36 posts at DZone. You can read more from them at their website. View Full User Profile

Static Members in Inner Classes? The Answer

  • submit to reddit

I asked a question a few days ago, regarding static members in inner classes. I presented an example with two static members, one was integer the other Object type, the integer compiled correctly and the Object did not. Here's how it looks like in the IDE:

Java Riddle

The answer is found in the Java Language Specification 3rd Edition, Section 8.1.3:

Inner classes may not declare static members, unless they are compile-time constant fields

That's the answer. The integer is a compile-time constant which is in-lined by the compiler. The Object is not. Here are some more examples:


By the way, if the class was a static nested class, rather than an inner-class, there wouldn't be any problem defining static members. Plus, constants are inherited when using extensions. This means that the following is legit:


IMHO, Java is not a complex language. It is much simpler than C++, for sure. However, it does have some odd edges.From http://zvikico.typepad.com/problog
Published at DZone with permission of its author, Zviki Cohen.

(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)



Mario Schwede replied on Mon, 2008/07/28 - 7:50am

With annotations it is similar. There are only compile-time constants allowed too. 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.