DevOps Zone is brought to you in partnership with:

Paul is a principal consultant at ThoughtWorks. He is enthusiastic about open source in particular. He is known for Dependency Injection (one of its pioneers with PicoContainer), Selenium browser automation (co-founder), Branch by Abstraction and most recently Client-Side MVC frameworks. Paul is a DZone MVB and is not an employee of DZone and has posted 89 posts at DZone. You can read more from them at their website. View Full User Profile

Push or Pull of Config Changes for a Production Stack

  • submit to reddit

So Logan has a viable "Application Configuration Application" (ACA). I'm reminded that I should never be allowed to name things. Hot Toggles (TM) might have been a better name for the thing. It's reallyworthchecking out.

An outstanding issue is how to get changed config data (JSON) to the nodes in a production stack that need it. We've implemented one simple mechanism for a sample Java app. In time we'd need to have code snippets (or reusable libraries) for many regular enterprise language choices.

Here's a brain-dump of the choices, without mentioning specific languages:

Where configurable nodes access ACA (pull)

  • Polling for changes on a separate thread
    • might suffer from thread death, and have restart issues
    • threads might be idiomatically incorrect for ‘container’
    • not all languages allow thread spawning
  • Polling for changes associated with a end-user request
    • blocking issues?
    • Could happen ahead of serving of request
    • Could happen after the response is served

For this design to work, the configurable nodes would need authentication details for the ACA

Where ACA directly modifies configurable nodes (push)

  • ACA directly pushes changed config to the nodes
    • ACA needs to authenticate with nodes, which feels backwards
    • multi-threading may help shorten the delay in updating many nodes
    • ACA has to maintain a list of the nodes that need updates
  • ACA pushes changed config on to a message bus, to which the nodes subscribe
    • encryption of data on the bus could be important

Hmm, I wonder if there is a Memcache/Ehcache way of securely percolating changed config...

Where ACA merely notifies configurable nodes of 'change' (push)

  • ACA pushes ‘some change has happened’ onto a message bus, nodes callback to ACA to pick-up changes.
    • nodes need authentication details for ACA
  • ACA directly notifies nodes that ‘some change has happened’, and the nodes callback to ACA to pick-up changes.
    • nodes need auth details for ACA, but not vice versa
    • multi-threading may help shorten the delay in updating many nodes
Published at DZone with permission of Paul Hammant, author and DZone MVB. (source)

(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)