OutOfMemoryError: Unable to Create New Native Thread – Problem Demystified
This article will revisit this HotSpot VM error and provide you with recommendations and resolution strategies.
If you are not familiar with the HotSpot JVM, I first recommend that you look at a high level view of its internal HotSpot JVM memory spaces. This knowledge is important in order for you to understand OutOfMemoryError problems related to the native (C-Heap) memory space.
OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread – what is it?
Let’s start with a basic explanation. This HotSpot JVM error is thrown when the internal JVM native code is unable to create a new Java thread. More precisely, it means that the JVM native code was unable to create a new “native” thread from the OS (Solaris, Linux, MAC, Windows...).
We can clearly see this logic from the OpenJDK 1.6 and 1.7 implementations as per below:
Unfortunately at this point you won’t get more detail than this error, with no indication of why the JVM is unable to create a new thread from the OS…
HotSpot JVM: 32-bit or 64-bit?
Before you go any further in the analysis, one fundamental fact that you must determine from your Java or Java EE environment is which version of HotSpot VM you are using e.g. 32-bit or 64-bit.
Why is it so important? What you will learn shortly is that this JVM problem is very often related to native memory depletion; either at the JVM process or OS level. For now please keep in mind that:
- A 32-bit JVM process is in theory allowed to grow up to 4 GB (even much lower on some older 32-bit Windows versions).
- For a 32-bit JVM process, the C-Heap is in a race with the Java Heap and PermGen space e.g. C-Heap capacity = 2-4 GB – Java Heap size (-Xms, -Xmx) – PermGen size (-XX:MaxPermSize)
- A 64-bit JVM process is in theory allowed to use most of the OS virtual memory available or up to 16 EB (16 million TB)
For a 64-bit JVM process, your main concern, from a JVM C-Heap perspective, is the capacity and availability of the OS physical, virtual and swap memory.
OK great but how does native memory affect Java threads creation?
Now back to our primary problem. Another fundamental JVM aspect to understand is that Java threads created from the JVM requires native memory from the OS. You should now start to understand the source of your problem…
The high level thread creation process is as per below:
- A new Java thread is requested from the Java program & JDK
- The JVM native code then attempt to create a new native thread from the OS
- The OS then attempts to create a new native thread as per attributes which include the thread stack size. Native memory is then allocated (reserved) from the OS to the Java process native memory space; assuming the process has enough address space (e.g. 32-bit process) to honour the request
- The OS will refuse any further native thread & memory allocation if the 32-bit Java process size has depleted its memory address space e.g. 2 GB, 3 GB or 4 GB process size limit
- The OS will also refuse any further Thread & native memory allocation if the virtual memory of the OS is depleted (including Solaris swap space depletion since thread access to the stack can generate a SIGBUS error, crashing the JVM * http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=6302804
- Java threads creation require native memory available from the OS; for both 32-bit & 64-bit JVM processes
- For a 32-bit JVM, Java thread creation also requires memory available from the C-Heap or process address space
Now that you understand native memory and JVM thread creation a little better, is it now time to look at your problem. As a starting point, I suggest that your follow the analysis approach below:
- Determine if you are using HotSpot 32-bit or 64-bit JVM
- When problem is observed, take a JVM Thread Dump and determine how many Threads are active
- Monitor closely the Java process size utilization before and during the OOM problem replication
- Monitor closely the OS virtual memory utilization before and during the OOM problem replication; including the swap memory space utilization if using Solaris OS
Proper data gathering as per above will allow you to collect the proper data points, allowing you to perform the first level of investigation. The next step will be to look at the possible problem patterns and determine which one is applicable for your problem case.
Problem pattern #1 – C-Heap depletion (32-bit JVM)
From my experience, OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread is quite common for 32-bit JVM processes. This problem is often observed when too many threads are created vs. C-Heap capacity. JVM Thread Dump analysis and Java process size monitoring will allow you to determine if this is the cause.
Problem pattern #2 – OS virtual memory depletion (64-bit JVM)
In this scenario, the OS virtual memory is fully depleted. This could be due to a few 64-bit JVM processes taking lot memory e.g. 10 GB+ and / or other high memory footprint rogue processes. Again, Java process size & OS virtual memory monitoring will allow you to determine if this is the cause.
Problem pattern #3 – OS virtual memory depletion (32-bit JVM)
The third scenario is less frequent but can still be observed. The diagnostic can be a bit more complex but the key analysis point will be to determine which processes are causing a full OS virtual memory depletion. Your 32-bit JVM processes could be either the source or the victim such as rogue processes using most of the OS virtual memory and preventing your 32-bit JVM processes to reserve more native memory for its thread creation process.
Please note that this problem can also manifest itself as a full JVM crash (as per below sample) when running out of OS virtual memory or swap space on Solaris.
# # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: # # java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: requested 32756 bytes for ChunkPool::allocate. Out of swap space? # # Internal Error (allocation.cpp:166), pid=2290, tid=27 # Error: ChunkPool::allocate # # JRE version: 6.0_24-b07 # Java VM: Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (19.1-b02 mixed mode solaris-sparc ) # If you would like to submit a bug report, please visit: # http://java.sun.com/webapps/bugreport/crash.jsp # --------------- T H R E A D --------------- Current thread (0x003fa800): JavaThread "CompilerThread1" daemon [_thread_in_native, id=27, stack(0x65380000,0x65400000)] Stack: [0x65380000,0x65400000], sp=0x653fd758, free space=501k Native frames: (J=compiled Java code, j=interpreted, Vv=VM code, C=native code) ………………Native memory depletion: symptom or root cause?
You now understand your problem and know which problem pattern you are dealing with. You are now ready to provide recommendations to address the problem…are you?
Your work is not done yet, please keep in mind that this JVM OOM event is often just a “symptom” of the actual root cause of the problem. The root cause is typically much deeper so before providing recommendations to your client I recommend that you really perform deeper analysis. The last thing you want to do is to simply address and mask the symptoms. Solutions such as increasing OS physical / virtual memory or upgrading all your JVM processes to 64-bit should only be considered once you have a good view on the root cause and production environment capacity requirements.
The next fundamental question to answer is how many threads were active at the time of the OutOfMemoryError? In my experience with Java EE production systems, the most common root cause is actually the application and / or Java EE container attempting to create too many threads at a given time when facing non happy paths such as thread stuck in a remote IO call, thread race conditions etc. In this scenario, the Java EE container can start creating too many threads when attempting to honour incoming client requests, leading to increase pressure point on the C-Heap and native memory allocation. Bottom line, before blaming the JVM, please perform your due diligence and determine if you are dealing with an application or Java EE container thread tuning problem as the root cause.
Once you understand and address the root cause (source of thread creations), you can then work on tuning your JVM and OS memory capacity in order to make it more fault tolerant and better “survive” these sudden thread surge scenarios.
- First perform a JVM Thread Dump analysis and determine the source of all the active threads vs. an established baseline. Determine what is causing your Java application or Java EE container to create so many threads at the time of the failure
- Please ensure that your monitoring tools closely monitor both your Java VM processes size & OS virtual memory. This crucial data will be required in order to perform a full root cause analysis
- Do not assume that you are dealing with an OS memory capacity problem. Look at all running processes and determine if your JVM processes are actually the source of the problem or victim of other processes consuming all the virtual memory
- Revisit your Java EE container thread configuration & JVM thread stack size. Determine if the Java EE container is allowed to create more threads than your JVM process and / or OS can handle
- Determine if the Java Heap size of your 32-bit JVM is too large, preventing the JVM to create enough threads to fulfill your client requests. In this scenario, you will have to consider reducing your Java Heap size (if possible), vertical scaling or upgrade to a 64-bit JVM
Capacity planning analysis to the rescue
As you may have seen from my past article on the Top 10 Causes of Java EE Enterprise Performance Problems, lack of capacity planning analysis is often the source of the problem. Any comprehensive load and performance testing exercise should also properly determine the Java EE container threads, JVM & OS native memory requirement for your production environment; including impact measurements of "non-happy" paths. This approach will allow your production environment to stay away from this type of problem and lead to better system scalability and stability in the long run.
Please provide any comment and share your experience with JVM native thread troubleshooting.
(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)