Nitin has posted 391 posts at DZone. View Full User Profile

JavaServer Faces 2.0 (JSR 314) Passes Final Ballot

05.27.2009
| 8697 views |
  • submit to reddit

The Java Community Process (JCP) today approved the JavaServer Faces (JSF) 2.0 specification.  12 of the participating members voted 'Yes' while the remaining four participants abstained. Abstentions included the Apache Software Foundation, IBM, SAP, and Nortel. 

JSF 2.0 adds a range of new features including Ajax support, ease of development features for custom component authoring, improved configuration management, a Page Description Language, and support for JSR 303 Bean Validation.

With the introduction of Ajax into the specification, JSF 2 builds upon important concepts from a variety of existing JSF Ajax frameworks, including a Javascript library for performing basic Ajax operations. According to the JSF 2 Proposed Final Draft Specification:

The library helps define a standard way of sending an Ajax request, and processing an Ajax response, since these are problem areas for component compatability. The specification provides two ways of adding Ajax to JSF web applications. Page authors may use the JavaScript library directly in their pages by attaching the Ajax request call to a JSF component via a JavaScript event (such as onclick). They may also take a more declarative aproach and use a core Facelets tag (<f:ajax/>) that they can nest within JSF components to “Ajaxify” them. It is also possible to “Ajaxify” regions of a page by “wrapping” the tag around component groups.

 

There are a slew of other new features in this highly anticipated release, which are listed on the JCP landing page for the specification.

DZone will be providing more JSF 2.0 coverage in the coming weeks, including a Q&A interview with the spec leads/participants, as well as a JSF 2.0 Refcard which goes live June 8th.

 

 

Published at DZone with permission of its author, Nitin Bharti.

(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)

Comments

Don Black replied on Sun, 2009/06/28 - 12:27pm

Why did the remaining four people abstain?

- green web hosting

Paul Web replied on Sun, 2011/10/16 - 9:13pm

I remember this panel meeting. The four groups abstaining (the Apache Software Foundation, IBM, SAP, and Nortel) did so to cover their, ahem, bases, doubting that the release was stable enough for new scalable architechtures.

 Paul - Dedicated Server Hosting UK

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.