Handling ActiveMQ disconnects in Camel CXF Routes: Part 2
So previously I showed you how to setup error handling when working with
Activemq from a CXF endpoint. So that is fine, but what if you need
ActiveMQ to be asynchronous? CXF will define the route as synchronous,
meaning ExchangePattern = InOut. This will force the route to be
synchronous, and therefore wait on a reply from the queue..... much like
I spelled out in part 1.
But what if we need ActiveMQ to be asynchronous? Seems easy, just change the exchange pattern to be InOnly for the ActiveMQ call like so:
With the ExchangePattern set to InOnly, you will see in SOAPUI that you just get an empty soap message. So what happened to the predefined response? If you have logging in you processor or bean that loads the response, you will see that it is still hitting your code, but it is not return the response for some reason.
THE REASON: The reason is you have an ExchangePattern of InOnly set when you run the onException code, this is causing the camel route to return before your processor is finished processing. So your exception processing does not effect the return to the CXF endpoint.
THE SOLUTION: you need to specify the onException portion of your route to be InOut using the following:
Published at DZone with permission of Heath Kesler, author and DZone MVB. (source)But what if we need ActiveMQ to be asynchronous? Seems easy, just change the exchange pattern to be InOnly for the ActiveMQ call like so:
.inOnly("activemq:queue.test")
So now your route returns much faster since it is not waiting on a reply
from the ActiveMQ endpoint. Cue the angels....... but wait, what
happens when we still need the error handling to catch the JMSException
and return a predefined response if..... lets say.... ActiveMQ is down? With the ExchangePattern set to InOnly, you will see in SOAPUI that you just get an empty soap message. So what happened to the predefined response? If you have logging in you processor or bean that loads the response, you will see that it is still hitting your code, but it is not return the response for some reason.
THE REASON: The reason is you have an ExchangePattern of InOnly set when you run the onException code, this is causing the camel route to return before your processor is finished processing. So your exception processing does not effect the return to the CXF endpoint.
THE SOLUTION: you need to specify the onException portion of your route to be InOut using the following:
.onException(Exception.class).handle(true).setExchangePattern(ExchangePattern.InOut).processRef(myProcessor)Now you should see your processor defined response from the onException getting passed back to the endpoint.
(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)






Comments
Fahmeed Nawaz replied on Tue, 2012/06/12 - 10:37am
>Note: The Mongo object instance actually represents a pool of connections to the database; you will only need one object of class Mongo even with multiple
>threads. See the concurrency doc page for more information.
Does this apply to the DB class also ? Collection objects? Can I keep one instantiated db object and use from all my threads ?