Google Wave Gone, But Not Quite A Failure
I'm sure most people have heard the news that Google are to cease development on Google Wave, one of their most hyped products, just a year since it's announcement.
..Wave has not seen the user adoption we would have liked. We don’t plan to continue developing Wave as a standalone product, but we will maintain the site at least through the end of the year and extend the technology for use in other Google projects. The central parts of the code, as well as the protocols that have driven many of Wave’s innovations, like drag-and-drop and character-by-character live typing, are already available as open source, so customers and partners can continue the innovation we began. In addition, we will work on tools so that users can easily “liberate” their content from Wave.
While I'm sure the investment into Wave has cost Google a bit, this reminds me of a quote I read recently from an interview with Joi Ito:
The good thing is, the cost of failure for open-source is nearly zero. The cost of failure for start-up companies is very small.
....
The author Clay Shirky talks about this: The cost of failure being low allows you to swing the bat a lot.
Sure, Wave wasn't the success we all thought it would be, but sometimes it's too difficult to live up to the hype. But it's not all waste, and not particularly a failure. I'm sure we'll see a lot of the components that enabled the full Wave concept appear in a lot of the applications we use in the coming years. If anything, this is encouraging for startups and people trying out new products. Players a big as Google can "fail", but there's always a lesson learned to bring forward to the next iteration/venture.
- Login or register to post comments
- 4957 reads
- Printer-friendly version
(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)




Comments
Alessandro Santini replied on Thu, 2010/08/05 - 6:32am
Personally I did not like Wave at all. The idea was indeed quite interesting, but the user interface was - at least for my tastes - extremely confusing.
Having said that, failures are the intermediate stops of the evolutionary path. If Wave did not tell us how the social apps should be, it told us how they should not be in order to be successful.
Casper Bang replied on Thu, 2010/08/05 - 6:45am
Gil Collins replied on Thu, 2010/08/05 - 8:16am
Andrew Arrigoni replied on Thu, 2010/08/05 - 8:19am
James Sugrue replied on Thu, 2010/08/05 - 8:23am
Tim O'farrell replied on Thu, 2010/08/05 - 9:22am
Since they were late to market the project was DOA - For most users the reaction was simply - "Why should I learn to use this wave thing when I already know how to use <Insert social networking site here>, and my friends all already use <Insert social networking site here>"
Dudu Zerah replied on Tue, 2010/08/10 - 11:32am
Gar Labs replied on Tue, 2011/08/23 - 10:01am