Mobile Zone is brought to you in partnership with:

I'm a coder from way back starting mostly with Java and moving on to cooler things like Rails. I like to dabble with newer technologies and languages. I do also run a fair bit to balance out the coding but am not very good at it as evidenced by my finishing times. Ricky is a DZone MVB and is not an employee of DZone and has posted 19 posts at DZone. You can read more from them at their website. View Full User Profile

First Impressions of Swift

  • submit to reddit

I’ve spent most of my idle cycles over the last week or so having a closer look at Swift, the new Apple programming language that was announced recently at WWDC. Here is a quick summary of what I like and dislike so far. Mind you, this is only after having a fairly brief look into Swift, so my opinions may change…


  • Optional/Inferred Typing - I really like this feature. I wish Java would adopt something similar. From my point of view, less typing means less code means less bugs
  • No header files - I always felt that I was stuck in the 80s when I was programming Objective-C with header files. Now they’re not necessary in Swift. Function declaration and implementation in the one spot
  • let vs var - Allows the developer to enforce some degree of immutability in programs
  • Named arguments - Particularly in functions with long argument lists, this comes in very handy
  • String interpolation - A neat little feature for replacing arguments in Strings
  • String construction - I hated the whole @"String" business in Objective-C, this has been done with in Swift
  • Interoperability with Objective-C - A few times I’ve had to include Objective-C files into my Swift project. I must say the ease in which this was done was impressive. All I needed was to define an Objective-C Bridging/Header file and import the header files that I required
  • Readable - As Swift has a much closer relationship with modern languages like Scala and Ruby, I just find it much more readable than Objective-C


  • ARC vs GC - Swift has support for Automatic Reference Counting (ARC) as opposed to Garbage Collection (GC). Granted ARC is a step up from leaving memory management entirely in the developer’s hands, however, I am concerned that there will be scenarios like (cyclic references) where developer’s will tie themselves in knots. I guess it is no different from Objective-C
  • Lack of scope - In most modern programming languages, there’s an ability to define scopes for your functions and variables. This is not possible with Swift and I’m sure this feature will be missed once projects become larger and you want to tightly control how objects interact with each other
  • Lack of data structures - Out of the box, Swift has support for 2 data structures, Array and Dictionary. I would have preferred several more like Stacks, Queues, Linked Lists, etc
  • Error handling - Typically there is some try/catch, begin/rescue syntax built into the language to handle exception/error handling. There’s none of this in the language. See here for a solution to this problem ( Still I think it's something that should really be in the language
Published at DZone with permission of Ricky Yim, author and DZone MVB. (source)

(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)



Mark Unknown replied on Tue, 2014/06/17 - 11:11am

Wish java has optional typing?  See java 8 and/or eclipse xtend. Or another jvm lang.  Less typing might mean less bugs but it also might make it harder to read.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.