Design Patterns Uncovered: The Interpreter Pattern
Today's pattern is the Interpreter pattern, which defines a grammatical representation for a language and provides an interpreter to deal with this grammar.
Interpreter in the Real World
The first example of interpreter that comes to mind, is a translator, allowing people to understand a foreign language. Perhaps musicians are a better example: musical notation is our grammar here, with musicians acting as interpreters, playing the music.
Design
Patterns Refcard
For a great overview of the most popular
design patterns, DZone's Design
Patterns Refcard is the best place to start.
The Interpreter Pattern
The Interpreter pattern is known as a
behavioural pattern, as
it's used to manage algorithms, relationships and responsibilities
between objects.. The
definition of Interpreter as provided in the original Gang of
Four book on Design
Patterns states: Given a language, define a representation for its grammar along with an interpreter that uses the representation to interpret sentences in the language.
The following diagram shows how the interpreter pattern is modelled.
Context contains information that is global to the interpreter. The AbstractExpression provides an interface for executing an operation. TerminalExpression implements the interpret interface associated with any terminal expressions in the defined grammar.
The Client either builds the Abstract Syntax Tree, or the AST is passed through to the client. An AST is composed of both TerminalExpressions and NonTerminalExpressions. The client will kick off the interpret operation. Note that the syntax tree is usually implemented using the Composite pattern
The pattern allows you to decouple the underlying expressions from the grammar.
When Would I Use This Pattern?
The Interpreter pattern should be used when you have a simple grammar that can be represented as an Abstract Syntax Tree. This is the more obvious use of the pattern. A more interesting and useful application of Interpreter is when you need a program to produce different types of output, such as a report generator.
So How Does It Work In Java?
I'll use a simple example to illustrate this pattern. We're going to create our own DSL for searching Amazon. To do this, we'll need to have a context that uses an Amazon web service to run our queries.
//Context
public class InterpreterContext
{
//assume web service is setup
private AmazonWebService webService;
public InterpreterContext(String endpoint)
{
//create the web service.
}
public ArrayList<Movie> getAllMovies()
{
return webService.getAllMovies();
}
public ArrayList<Book> getAllBooks()
{
return webService.getAllBooks();
}
}
Next, we'll need to create an abstract expression:
//Abstract Expression
public abstract class AbstractExpression
{
public abstract String interpret( InterpreterContext context);
}
We'll have many different expressions to interpret our queries. For illustration,let's create just one:
//Concrete Expression
public class BookAuthorExpression extends AbstractExpression
{
private String searchString;
public BookAuthorExpression(String searchString)
{
this.searchString = searchString;
}
public String interpret(InterpreterContext context)
{
ArrayList<Book> books = context.getAllBooks();
StringBuffer result = new StringBuffer();
for(Book book: books)
{
if(book.getAuthor().equalsIgnoreCase(searchString))
{
result.append(book.toString());
}
}
return result;
}
}
Finally, we need a client to drive all of this. Let's assume that our language is of the following type of syntax:
books by author 'author name'
The client will determine which expression to use to get our results:
//client
public class AmazonClient
{
private InterpreterContext context;
public AmazonClient(InterpreterContext context)
{
this.context = context;
}
/**
* Interprets a string input of the form
* movies | books by title | year | name '<string>'
*/
public String interpret(String expression)
{
//we need to parse the string to determine which expression to use
AbstractExpression exp = null;
String[] stringParts = expression.split(" ");
String main = stringParts[0];
String sub = stringParts[2];
//get the query part
String query = expression.substring(expression.firstIndexOf("'"), expression.lastIndexOf("'"));
if(main.equals("books"))
{
if(sub.equals("title")
{
exp = new BookTitleExpression(query);
}
if(sub.equals("year")
{
exp = new BookYearExpression(query);
}
}
else if(main.equals("movie"))
{
//similar statements to create movie expressions
}
if(exp != null)
{
exp.interpret(context);
}
}
public static void main(String[] args)
{
InterpreterContext context = new InterpreterContext("http://aws.amazon.com/");
AmazonClient client = new AmazonClient();
//run a query
String result = client.interpret("books by author 'John Connolly'");
System.out.println(result);
}
}
I admit the example is a bit simple, and you would probably have a more intelligent context, but that should give you the idea of how this pattern works.
Watch Out for the Downsides
Efficiency is a big concern for any implementation of this pattern. Introducing your own grammar requires extensive error checking, which will be time consuming for the programmer to implement, and needs careful design in order to run efficiently at runtime. Also, as the grammar becomes more complicated, the maintainence effort is increased.
Other
Articles in This Series
The
Observer Pattern
The
Adapter Pattern
The
Facade Pattern
The
Factory Method Pattern
The
Abstract Factory Pattern
The
Singleton Pattern
The
Strategy Pattern
The
Visitor Pattern
The
Decorator Pattern
The
Proxy Pattern
The
Command Pattern
The
Chain of Responsibility Pattern
Next Up
As we've mentioned the Composite pattern in this article when dealing with Abstract Syntax Trees, I'll cover Composite in the next article.
(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)





Comments
Reginaldo L. Ru... replied on Tue, 2010/05/11 - 9:52am
Great article James,
but I'm little bit confused.
Shouldn't "BookAuthorExpression" extends "AbstractExpression"?
James Sugrue replied on Tue, 2010/05/11 - 10:40am
in response to: bagrehc
Florian Over replied on Wed, 2010/05/12 - 3:27am
Nice Article and great series.
But:
Is there a special reason you choose the concrete ArrayList instead of the interface List in the method signature?
James Sugrue replied on Wed, 2010/05/12 - 10:53am
in response to: igunat
Thanks Florian
No reason at all - it would have been better to use List :)
James
John Katethon replied on Thu, 2010/06/03 - 9:34am
hello,
line 60. should be AmazonClient client = new AmazonClient(context); instead of AmazonClient client = new AmazonClient();
JKT