Jay Fields is a software developer at DRW Trading. He has a passion for discovering and maturing innovative solutions. His most recent work has been in the Domain Specific Language space where he's delivered applications that empowered subject matter experts to write the business rules of the applications. He is also very interested in maturing software design through software testing. Jay is a DZone MVB and is not an employee of DZone and has posted 115 posts at DZone. You can read more from them at their website. View Full User Profile

Clojure: expectations & with-redefs

06.15.2012
| 3330 views |
  • submit to reddit

In general, when I'm writing tests, the pure functions end up as bare expects and the impure functions end up as scenarios. The following contrived namespace keeps a list of users and allows you to get the full name of each user.

(ns user)

(def users (atom #{}))

(defn full-name [{:keys [fname lname]}] (str fname " " lname))

(defn all-names [] (map full-name @users))

The tests for this namespace would often look something like the following code:

(ns user-expectations
  (:use expectations user))

(expect "John Dory" (full-name {:fname "John" :lname "Dory"}))

(ns user-expectations.scenarios
  (:use expectations.scenarios user))

(scenario
  (with-redefs [users (atom #{{:fname "Mary", :lname "Dory"} {:fname "John", :lname "Dory"}})]
    (expect ["Mary Dory" "John Dory"] (all-names))))

It feels natural to put the with-redefs in a scenario, since scenarios also support (and often make use of) stubbing, localize-state, & freeze-time. However, there's really no reason that you need to use a scenario if you're simply looking to redef a var.

The following test provides the same level of functionality verification, without needing to use expectations.scenarios: 

(ns user-expectations
  (:use expectations user))

(expect "John Dory" (full-name {:fname "John" :lname "Dory"}))

(expect ["Mary Dory" "John Dory"]
  (with-redefs [users (atom #{{:fname "Mary", :lname "Dory"} {:fname "John", :lname "Dory"}})]
    (all-names)))

scenarios are great, but these days I try to keep things simple with bare expectations whenever possible.

 

Published at DZone with permission of Jay Fields, author and DZone MVB. (source)

(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)