10 Reasons Web Developers Should Learn AngularJS
If you are familiar with Angular, this post may give you some ideas to think about that you hadn’t encountered before. If you know Angular and are trying to justify its adoption at your company or on your project, this post can provide you with some background information that may help. If you have no idea what Angular is, read on, because I’ll share why it’s so powerful and then point you to resources that will get you up to speed, quickly.
I can only assume other organizations are seeing positive results after adopting Angular. According to Google Trends the popularity of AngularJS (blue) compared to KnockoutJS (red) and “Single Page Applications” (yellow) is exploding.
One of the first single-track AngularJS conferences, ng-conf, sold out hundreds of tickets in just a few minutes.
This post isn’t intended to bash KnockoutJS or Ember or Backbone or any of the other popular frameworks that you may already be using and are familiar with. Instead, I’d like to focus on why I believe AngularJS is gaining so much momentum so quickly and is something anyone who works on web applications should take very seriously and at least learn more about to decide if it’s the right tool to put in your box.
1. AngularJS Gives XAML Developers a Place to Go on the Web
I make this bullet a little “tongue-in-cheek” because the majority of developers using Angular probably haven’t touched XAML with a 10 foot pole. That’s OK; the reasons why XAML became popular in the Microsoft world through WPF, Silverlight, and now Windows Store app development are important to look at because they translate quite well to Angular. If you’re not familiar with XAML, it is a declarative language based on XML used to instantiate object graphs and set values. You can define various types of objects with properties and literally mark up a set that will get created. The most common types of objects to create are user interface elements such as panels and controls that create a display. XAML makes it easy to layout complex UIs that may change over time. XAML supports inheritance (properties defined as children of parents can pick up values set higher in the tree) and bubbles events similar to the HTML DOM.
Another interesting component of XAML is the support for data-binding. This allows there to exist a declared relationship between the presentation layer and your data without creating hard dependencies between components. The XAML layer understands there is a contract – i.e. “I expect a name to be published” and the imperative code simply exposes a property without any knowledge of how it will be rendered. This enables any number of testing scenarios, decouples the UI from underlying logic in a way that allows your design to be volatile without having to refactor tons of code, and enables a truly parallel workflow between designers and developers.
This may sound like lip-service, but I’ve been on many projects and have seen it in action. I recall two specific examples. One was a project with Microsoft that we had to finish in around 4 months. We estimated a solid 4 months of hands-on development and a separate design team required about 4 months of design before all was said and done – they went from wireframes to comps to interactive mock-ups and motion study and other terms that make me thankful I can let the designers do that while I focus on code. Of course if we followed the traditional, sequential approach, we would have missed our deadline and waited 8 months (4 months of design followed by 4 months of coding). XAML allowed us to work in parallel, by agreeing upon an interface for a screen – "These are the elements we’ll expose.” The developers worked on grabbing the data to make those properties available and wrote all of the tests around them, and the designers took the elements and manipulated, animated, and moved them around until they reached the desired design. It all came together brilliantly in the end.
The other real world example was a pilot program with a cable company. We were building a Silverlight-based version of their interactive guide. The only problem was that they didn’t have the APIs ready yet. We were able to design the system based on a domain model that mapped what the user would experience – listings, times, etc. – then fill those domain objects with the APIs once they were defined and available. Again, it enabled a parallel workflow that greatly improved our efficiency and the flexibility of the design.
I see these same principles reflected in the Angular framework. It enables a separation of concerns that allows a true parallel workflow between various components including the markup for the UI itself and the underlying logic that fetches and processes data.
2. AngularJS Gets Rid of Ritual and Ceremony
Picture Credit: Piotr Siedlecki
Have you ever created a text property on a model that you want to bind to your UI? How is that done in various frameworks? In Angular, this will work without any issues and immediately reflect what you type in the span:
Of course, you’ll seldom have the luxury of building an app that simple, but it illustrates how easy and straightforward data-binding can be in the Angular world. There is very little ritual or ceremony involved with standing up a model that participates in data-binding. You don’t have to derive from an existing object or explicitly declare your properties and dependencies – for the most part, you can just pass something you already have to Angular and it just works. That’s very powerful. If you’re curious how it works, Angular uses dirty tracking.
Although I understand some other frameworks have gotten better with this, moving away from our existing framework where we had to explicitly map everything over to an interim object to data-bind to Angular was like a breath of fresh air … things just started coming together more quickly and I felt like I was duplicating less code. Who wants to define a contact table, then a contact domain object on the server, then a contact JSON object that then has to be passed to a contact client-side model just to, ah, display details about a contact?
(Note: Opinions expressed in this article and its replies are the opinions of their respective authors and not those of DZone, Inc.)